Several key studies have found that a small minority of producers, polluting at levels far exceeding group averages, generate the majority of overall exposure to industrial toxics. Frequently, such patterns go unnoticed and are understudied outside of the academic community. To our knowledge, no research to date has systematically described the scope and extent of extreme variations in industrially based exposure estimates and sought to link inequities in harm produced to inequities in exposure. In an analysis of all permitted industrial facilities across the United States, we show that there exists a class of hyper-polluters—the worst-of-the-worst—that disproportionately expose communities of color and low income populations to chemical releases. This study hopes to move beyond a traditional environmental justice research frame, bringing new computational methods and perspectives aimed at the empirical study of societal power dynamics. Our findings suggest the possibility that substantial environmental gains may be made through selective environmental enforcement, rather than sweeping initiatives.
Highlights of 2016
Dear Colleague,
2016 saw Environmental Research Letters (ERL) celebrate it's 10th anniversary, publishing a special highlights collection to mark this milestone. To complement this, we're honoured to present the journal's annual highlights featuring 30 of the most innovative ground-breaking articles published in 2016. This special Editor's selection includes research on environmental justice, ecology, extreme climate events, global food security, public health, as well as many articles documenting the increasing influence of anthropogenic effects on natural systems and the interventions required to help mitigate against these impacts.
ERL continues to be a venue of choice for researchers wishing to reach out beyond their own communities, an increasingly important facet of modern scientific dissemination. Our thanks to the journal's Editorial Board, authors, readers and supporters for making this possible.
2016 saw the continued growth of our new Environmental Research Reviews section of ERL, led by our Reviews Editor, Daniel Rubenstein (Princeton University). As well as significant interest from researchers in proposing their own review articles for the journal, 10 new articles were published providing the community with much needed evidence-based resources covering a range of important subjects. We continue to encourage authors to propose their own topics for new review articles in timely areas across the whole of environmental science.
ERL also introduced 'Tweetable Abstracts', where our authors are asked to submit a one-line summary of their abstract succinctly describing the key results or significance of the work. These Tweetable Abstracts are used to circulate our articles via social media, increasing the visibility of authors' research. In addition, articles in ERL are now available within 24 hours of acceptance via our Accepted Manuscripts service, further improving the availability and dissemination of timely work.
Never before has the importance of ERL's vision been more evident, and our continued championing of values such as open science, cross-disciplinary approaches, and impact-focussed research aimed at informing evidence-based policy more necessary. This remains critical to the safeguarding of our planet, and ERL is proud to serve the scientific community in striving to meet these shared goals. Our thanks to the journal's Editorial Board, authors, readers and supporters for making this possible.
Enjoy the collection, and we hope this years highlights will inspire you to submit your next article to ERL!

Daniel Kammen
Editor-in-Chief, Environmental Research Letters

Guillaume Wright
Executive Editor, Environmental Research Letters